Charles Kaiser has an interesting item on the Portfolio.com site that despite the dramatic increase in Dow Jones & Co. stock due to the $60-a-share offer from News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch to buy the owner of The Wall Street Journal, few journalists there are selling their stock.
Kaiser wrote, “For one thing, Dow Jones has very strict conflict of interest rules — and they prohibited anyone involved in the coverage of Murdoch’s takeover attempt from either exercising their Dow Jones stock options or selling any of their Dow Jones stock. That group includes all of the editors on the masthead — the ones most likely to have the largest number of options, or the greatest numbers of shares.
“Another limiting factor — even for those not involved in the coverage — is the fact that Dow Jones stock options don’t vest for three years. So only those options granted before 2005 could be exercised right now.
“‘I have some options which are not in the money,’ said Jim Browning, a Wall Street Journal reporter and union activist, ‘and if you look at the history of the stock, even at $60, it’s not a huge gain.’
“That’s because as recently as January, 2004, the stock was trading in the low 50s — so even if employees had bought 200 shares at a 15 percent discount (which every employee is entitled to do every year) — depending on when they made their purchases, their profits would not be gigantic.”
Read more here.
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
The Financial Times has hired Barbara Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels. She will start…