The decision by the Dow Jones & Co. board to take over negotiations with News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch and other potential bidders for the company that owns The Wall Street Journal, Barron’s and Marketwatch signals a growing rift between the Bancroft family that controls the company and the business itself, writes Sarah Ellison of The Journal.
“In recent weeks, members of the Bancroft family had grown wary of any deal with Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp., and had been laboring over a proposal to safeguard the editorial independence of Dow Jones. But as the family’s negotiations with each other and their advisors continued with no resolution in sight, the company’s directors were growing increasingly concerned that by not responding to Mr. Murdoch, the family was endangering the negotiations.”
Read more here.
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…
The Fund for American Studies presented James Bennet of The Economist with the Kenneth Y. Tomlinson Award…
The Wall Street Journal is experimenting with AI-generated article summaries that appear at the top…
Zach Cohen is joining Bloomberg Tax to cover the fiscal cliff and tax issues on…
Larry Avila has been named interim editor for Automotive Dive, an Industry Dive publication. He…
View Comments
For the companies involved in mergers, the merger deal more often than not turns out to be a bad deal for both firms involved. The reason they keep happening is that executives without a major ownership stake resentful of "coupon clipping owners" as the folks running Dow Jones are of the Bancrofts, look for the golden parachute they get in any buyout. The reasoning being that they can make 10 or 20 years income on one deal and then go on to loot some other company. Clearly, the Bancrofts should have been more hands on in corporate management, and used some of the dividend income to buy stock when the stock was cheap.