Categories: OLD Media Moves

CNBC ratings hit seven-year low

Nielsen stats show CNBC’s ratings for the second quarter were the lowest since 2005, reports Jeff Reeves, editor of InvstorPlace.com.

Reeves writes, “The proof is in the specifics of some of CNBC’s stock-focused shows, based on some numbers I got a hold of:

  • Squawk Box (6-9 a.m.) is supposed to prime traders before the bell. The show posted its lowest rated its time block since Q4 2006.
  • The Closing Bell (3-5 p.m.) is supposed to wrap up the day’s action. The slot posted its fifth-lowest rating in total viewers and second-lowest ratings in the key 25-54 demographic since 1997.
  • Fast Money (5-6 p.m.) is focused almost specifically on swing trading stocks. That time slot showed the lowest rating for the 25-54 demo since 1997 — and lowest in total viewers since Fast Money launched in 2006.

“Not good.

“Of course, out of respect for CNBC it must be noted that it’s not their fault the market is miserable, and bad ratings don’t necessarily reflect bad shows. After all, we don’t blame builders like Pulte or Lennar for causing the housing crisis with poorly made homes.

“It’s also worth noting that many cable networks are experiencing a viewership drain as many younger folks take their eyeballs to the Internet — and CNBC is hardly ignoring the move to online content.”

Read more here.

Chris Roush

Chris Roush was the dean of the School of Communications at Quinnipiac University in Hamden, Connecticut. He was previously Walter E. Hussman Sr. Distinguished Professor in business journalism at UNC-Chapel Hill. He is a former business journalist for Bloomberg News, Businessweek, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Tampa Tribune and the Sarasota Herald-Tribune. He is the author of the leading business reporting textbook "Show me the Money: Writing Business and Economics Stories for Mass Communication" and "Thinking Things Over," a biography of former Wall Street Journal editor Vermont Royster.

View Comments

  • Their programming has stunk for years. They have been more focused on building their own celebrity through book writing, ads, etc than providing great content. It just takes time before viewers realize they provide no value to the investment decision process. Additionally, viewers are finding media such as Twitter far more utilitarian.

  • People are figuring out CNBC is nothing but a "Serve Wall St. and it's views machine". Always Bullish and Always why you need to buy now. Anyone who didn't see the financial crisis coming isn't worth toilet paper. Corporate CNBC consistently fails to inform it's viewers of the continuing WORLD DEBT CRISIS and it's impact on America. Hide and Obviscate the Horrible Economy to keep people stupid and invested so that CNBC/GE/MSNBC keep their liberal President in power.

  • The viewers have beat feet for a number of reasons:
    1. The "personalities" are bigger than the news cf. Kernan; 2. Conflict of interest as Mgrs talk their book; 3. Most know the emotional frenzy they cook and boil over mere noise is antithetical to profits; 4. The channel is less about news and more about anchors giving "their" spin- which is a contrarian indicator. They just forgot how to interview properly.

  • Matt,
    I disagree with the last sentence of your comment because CNBC does blast democrats and the Obama administration frequently. They are not like MSNBC at all. Rick Santelli, Maria Bartiromo, Joe Kiernan, Larry Kudlow, and almost all their other on-air personalities blame the dems for all the business regulation and fault them for the economy.

    I do agree with your first point about CNBC serving Wall Street. They basically refuse to hold any Wall St. firms accountable for anything. They are so afraid of losing access to CEO interviews, that they really do not challenge big wall street firms at all.

  • I was a big time viewer of CNBC. 24/7. I would rather watch Bloomberg or Fox now and never watch CNBC. The screaming is out of control. Go to Bloomberg and they are so quiet and in control. Cramer is just totally obnoxious. But the reason i hate CNBC is Ric Santelli. How they let this Univ of Ill at somewhere graduate have 2 hrs a day to rant and rave his opinions is one of the scariest things ever. As if he is the expert on everything. Ever hear him LISTEN to anyone? Just his moronic, self serving rants. Anytime someone challenges him on the facts he just screams over them, until they stop debating. Pathetic.

Recent Posts

Advocate seeks a business reporter in Baton Rouge

The Advocate is looking for a savvy reporter to cover the Baton Rouge business scene…

1 day ago

MLex seeks a reporter in Washington

MLex, a LexisNexis company, is an independent news organization for breaking news and forward-looking analysis…

1 day ago

Austin Biz Journal seeks an economic development reporter

The Austin Business Journal seeks a staff writer to cover economic development in one of…

1 day ago

Forbes journalist in Russia placed under house arrest

A Russian court on Saturday placed Sergei Mingazov, a journalist for the Russian edition of…

1 day ago

Investor’s Business Daily turns 40

Justin Nielsen of Investor's Business Daily writes about the newspaper's 40th anniversary. Nielsen writes, "When the…

1 day ago

Fieseler to cover renewable energy, climate and tech for Politico/E&E News

Clare Fieseler has been hired by Politico and subsidiary E&E News to cover renewable energy,…

1 day ago