Categories: OLD Media Moves

CNBC ratings hit seven-year low

Nielsen stats show CNBC’s ratings for the second quarter were the lowest since 2005, reports Jeff Reeves, editor of InvstorPlace.com.

Reeves writes, “The proof is in the specifics of some of CNBC’s stock-focused shows, based on some numbers I got a hold of:

  • Squawk Box (6-9 a.m.) is supposed to prime traders before the bell. The show posted its lowest rated its time block since Q4 2006.
  • The Closing Bell (3-5 p.m.) is supposed to wrap up the day’s action. The slot posted its fifth-lowest rating in total viewers and second-lowest ratings in the key 25-54 demographic since 1997.
  • Fast Money (5-6 p.m.) is focused almost specifically on swing trading stocks. That time slot showed the lowest rating for the 25-54 demo since 1997 — and lowest in total viewers since Fast Money launched in 2006.

“Not good.

“Of course, out of respect for CNBC it must be noted that it’s not their fault the market is miserable, and bad ratings don’t necessarily reflect bad shows. After all, we don’t blame builders like Pulte or Lennar for causing the housing crisis with poorly made homes.

“It’s also worth noting that many cable networks are experiencing a viewership drain as many younger folks take their eyeballs to the Internet — and CNBC is hardly ignoring the move to online content.”

Read more here.

Chris Roush

Chris Roush was the dean of the School of Communications at Quinnipiac University in Hamden, Connecticut. He was previously Walter E. Hussman Sr. Distinguished Professor in business journalism at UNC-Chapel Hill. He is a former business journalist for Bloomberg News, Businessweek, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Tampa Tribune and the Sarasota Herald-Tribune. He is the author of the leading business reporting textbook "Show me the Money: Writing Business and Economics Stories for Mass Communication" and "Thinking Things Over," a biography of former Wall Street Journal editor Vermont Royster.

View Comments

  • Their programming has stunk for years. They have been more focused on building their own celebrity through book writing, ads, etc than providing great content. It just takes time before viewers realize they provide no value to the investment decision process. Additionally, viewers are finding media such as Twitter far more utilitarian.

  • People are figuring out CNBC is nothing but a "Serve Wall St. and it's views machine". Always Bullish and Always why you need to buy now. Anyone who didn't see the financial crisis coming isn't worth toilet paper. Corporate CNBC consistently fails to inform it's viewers of the continuing WORLD DEBT CRISIS and it's impact on America. Hide and Obviscate the Horrible Economy to keep people stupid and invested so that CNBC/GE/MSNBC keep their liberal President in power.

  • The viewers have beat feet for a number of reasons:
    1. The "personalities" are bigger than the news cf. Kernan; 2. Conflict of interest as Mgrs talk their book; 3. Most know the emotional frenzy they cook and boil over mere noise is antithetical to profits; 4. The channel is less about news and more about anchors giving "their" spin- which is a contrarian indicator. They just forgot how to interview properly.

  • Matt,
    I disagree with the last sentence of your comment because CNBC does blast democrats and the Obama administration frequently. They are not like MSNBC at all. Rick Santelli, Maria Bartiromo, Joe Kiernan, Larry Kudlow, and almost all their other on-air personalities blame the dems for all the business regulation and fault them for the economy.

    I do agree with your first point about CNBC serving Wall Street. They basically refuse to hold any Wall St. firms accountable for anything. They are so afraid of losing access to CEO interviews, that they really do not challenge big wall street firms at all.

  • I was a big time viewer of CNBC. 24/7. I would rather watch Bloomberg or Fox now and never watch CNBC. The screaming is out of control. Go to Bloomberg and they are so quiet and in control. Cramer is just totally obnoxious. But the reason i hate CNBC is Ric Santelli. How they let this Univ of Ill at somewhere graduate have 2 hrs a day to rant and rave his opinions is one of the scariest things ever. As if he is the expert on everything. Ever hear him LISTEN to anyone? Just his moronic, self serving rants. Anytime someone challenges him on the facts he just screams over them, until they stop debating. Pathetic.

Recent Posts

NPR seeks a tech reporter in San Francisco

NPR seeks a Technology Reporter who will focus on how the tech industry shapes our lives…

34 mins ago

SABEW starts retiree membership, benefits

The Society for Advancing Business Editing and Writing has launched a retiree membership. A retiree…

1 hour ago

How the FT connects with consumers

Tim Healy of The Drum interviewed Fiona Spooner, the managing director of consumer revenue at…

1 hour ago

SpaceNews hires Gruss as chief content and strategy officer

Mike Gruss, the former editor in chief of Defense News, has been hired as chief…

7 hours ago

Marfil among the WSJ layoffs in DC

Jude Marfil, newsroom operations manager for The Wall Street Journal in its Washington office, was…

23 hours ago

Greene departing Cointelegraph

Tristan Greene, deputy U.S. news editor at cryptocurrency news site CoinTelegraph, is leaving next month…

23 hours ago