Peter Lauria of the New York Post catches CNBC with some questionable reporting on parent company General Electric Co.’s earnings and provides advice for any business reporter covering earnings.
“What?
“Unless Pisani was attempting to coin a new oxymoron, there is no such thing as flattish growth. A company’s earnings outlook can be down, flat, or up. There’s no such thing as a flattish decline, either.
“When it comes to GE’s earnings, which have declined for several quarters in a row, CNBC’s anchors are well-versed in such linguistic gymnastics. When GE famously shocked Wall Street by missing its quarterly earnings expectations last year, the network’s anchors repeatedly used such euphemisms as ‘essentially in-line’ or ‘basically flat’ or ‘slightly below projections’ to soften the blow of the miss.
“Here’s a short lesson on earnings reporting: An outlook can be down, flat or up, and results can be missed, made or exceeded. Synonyms are acceptable.”
Read more here.
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
The Financial Times has hired Barbara Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels. She will start…
CNBC.com deputy technology editor Todd Haselton is leaving the news organization for a job at The Verge.…
Note from CNBC Business News senior vice president Dan Colarusso: After more than 27 years…
Members of the CoinDesk editorial team have sent a letter to the CEO of its…