TheStreet.com media critic Marek Fuchs writes Wednesday that media coverage of Cisco’s earnings was either too positive or too negative, and both missed the real story.
“But in another aspect, the business media shed Cisco’s earnings in too-positive a light, siding with the small beat of expectations in the quarter just passed vs. the small notes of caution the company laid down about the future.
“The Wall Street Journal made a clear choice, leading with the headline ‘Cisco Profit Climbs 4.4% on Sales Growth’ and subordinating this to the subheadline: ‘Chief Sees Uncertainty Over Economy Lingering for Next Few Quarters.’
“This is not uncommon, nor totally inappropriate. But in all articles that are more positive than not about a company that obviously reported just-better-than-expected earnings, you, the savvy investor, should decide where that positivity stems from. Is what you’re reading colored, for example, by a particularly good day in the stock market?”
Read more here.
PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…