Bloomberg News corrected a story Friday published Thursday that initially quoted an analyst report paid for by the company, BioSolar, and the update story now states that the analyst was paid.
The original story did not disclose that the analyst had been paid for the report.
The story now reads, “Beacon said in a statement distributed Jan. 10 by PR Newswire that it was compensated $15,000 and 100,000 restricted shares by a third party for enrollment of BioSolar in a research program, without giving more specific information. Earlier today, BloggingStocks.com reported the payment.
“‘Any discrepancies in our disclosure was an oversight, if anything, and we will fix the information,’ Jeff Bishop, editor of Beacon, said in a telephone interview Jan. 18. ‘Victor Sula is paid in cash, on salary, and doesn’t have any affiliation with BioSolar.’ Bishop said he doesn’t have a telephone number for Sula, who works in Europe.
“Lee didn’t return phone or e-mail messages Jan. 18 seeking comment on the compensation.”
BloggingStocks.com had earlier criticized the story for not disclosing the conflict of interest.
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…
The Fund for American Studies presented James Bennet of The Economist with the Kenneth Y. Tomlinson Award…
The Wall Street Journal is experimenting with AI-generated article summaries that appear at the top…
View Comments
Christallmighty, this blogging stocks guy shows the difference between real journalism and bloggers at their worst. Bloomberg made an error. From what it seems, the disclosure was made in a seperate statement--not the analyst;s report -- and the rpeort simply missed it. Under the pressure of deadlines these things happen. SABEW members should understand this. It looks like when the matter came to light Bloomberg stepped up and corrected the story. That's the right thing to do.
Instead this moron at bloggingstocks refers to "the garbage" coming out of Bloomberg, but his file never SHOWED that the disclosure was in a separate statement from the company, and implied that the disclosure was in the anaylt's report and Bloomberg "intentionally" skipped it.. That's dishonest and crappy writing.
I.F. Stoner,
With all due respect, Bloomberg completely missed the disclosure as it is, and always has been, in the Beacon Equity Research's report on the stock:
http://www.beaconequityresearch.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=519&Itemid=62
Read the fine print down at the bottom. Bloomberg's assertion in the artcile that the disclosure was missing from the report is totally false. They just didn't see it, but that doesn't mean it's not there.
I would argue that our piece on Bloomberg's misstep was blogging at its best -- catching serious errors on the part of a major news organization that could have cost investors a lot of money.
I can certainly deal with being called a "moron", but please do refrain from accusing me of dishonest and crappy writing when our facts were 100% accurate.
Thanks,
Zac