Categories: OLD Media Moves

Bloomberg reporter recommends quote structure for source

John Aravosis writes on the AmericaBlog that Bloomberg News reporter Dan Golden suggested a potential quote for a source, investment banker Mark DeFusco, when a story he was working on about for-profit educational companies was being edited.

Aravosis writes, “Let’s put aside for a moment the fact that Bloomberg is reportedly writing critical stories about its competition, and not divulging that fact to its readers (Bloomberg is starting up a for-profit education venture that few people know about, at the same time that Bloomberg is writing articles highly critical of their future competitors in the for-profit education sector).

“But as I said, let’s put that potentially huge, undivulged, conflict of interest aside. Now what if Bloomberg’s reporter, writing critical stories about the future competition, told its sources what specific critical quotes it wanted for the story — literally telling the source what to say?”

The e-mail that Golden wrote to DeFusco can be found here. In the e-mail, Golden wrote, “I’d love it if you could come up something on the record that might reflect some of this — perhaps along the lines of — Phoenix’s original model was magic because XXX — but the current model has some of the same flaws that have dogged other for-profit schools — X and Y.”

Golden, a Pulitzer Prize winner, was hired earlier this year by Bloomberg. He is an editor at large in the Boston bureau who previously worked for Conde Nast Portfolio and The Wall Street Journal.

View Comments

  • Full disclosure: I worked at Bloomberg and I know and respect Dan Golden.
    As I understand, the for-profit education venture, which is being run by Lex Fenwick and is unconnected to the news operation, is a seminar/trade show operation, not a for-profit college, so it is NOT a competitor to the business Dan has investigated (brilliantly). In fact, those businesses are potentially customers for the new Bloomberg venture, which makes Bloomberg's willingness to delve into their operations even more courageous. (And I wonder if Dan even knows about the new venture -- I only found out about it by accident).
    As for the "quote structure" allegation, well, you guys are showing your lack of understand of how to handle OTR sources. It's TOTALLY de riquer to try to convince people who've given you OTR info to go ON the record. And there's NOTHING wrong with helping them craft something for the record that will be a distillation of what they've already told you OTR.

Recent Posts

CNBC taps Sullivan as “Power Lunch” co-anchor

CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…

9 hours ago

Business Insider hires Brooks as standards editor

Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…

10 hours ago

Is this the end of CoinDesk as we know it?

Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…

1 day ago

LinkedIn finance editor Singh departs

Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…

2 days ago

Washington Post announces start of third newsroom

Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…

3 days ago

FT hires Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels

The Financial Times has hired Barbara Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels. She will start…

3 days ago