Marek Fuchs, the Business Press Maven on TheStreet.com, examined the recent AT&T/BellSouth deal coverage and pronounced that it was full of skepticism and good coverage, unlike past merger coverage in recent years.
“It’s all a result of what I call ‘devil’s advocacy journalism,’ God bless it.
“Now let’s hop backwards for a second, in the hope that you will learn what sort of mergers lend themselves to good coverage and which tend to be covered in a way that, if followed to the (witless) letter, will have you trading down from Caddy to Chevy.”
“Plain old ‘advocacy journalism’ is, of course, the sort that tries to push a worthy cause. All fine and good except when the journalist defines a worthy cause as the latest in splashy, high profile mega-merger. Name one, you ask. How about two?”
Read his analysis here.
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…
The Fund for American Studies presented James Bennet of The Economist with the Kenneth Y. Tomlinson Award…
The Wall Street Journal is experimenting with AI-generated article summaries that appear at the top…