Jonathan Cutler, a sociology professor at Wesleyan University and an expert on unions, writes on his blog that the business media coverage of the recent settlement between the United Auto Workers and General Motors shows that the union probably got a bad deal.
“It is unabashedly and transparently pro-business. But that transparent bias is precisely what makes it potentially more interesting and more reliable than mainstream media accounts. Business press bias means that union victories are often disparaged while union defeats are celebrated.
“To read ‘against the grain’ of business press bias requires only that one reverse the terms: expressions of fear, disappointment, and rage in the pages of the business press are best interpreted as signs union strength. Expressions of euphoria and/or indifference in the business press can signal union weakness and a raw deal for workers.
“So, what is the business press saying about the UAW-GM deal? Are the signs of fear and trembling at a labor movement is willing to stand up for the members, stand up for the retirees and take some risks?
“Hardly.”
Read more here.
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
The Financial Times has hired Barbara Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels. She will start…