TheStreet.com’s Marek Fuchs writes Friday that the business media’s coverage of Starbucks annual meeting showed how well an executive can get journalists to write what he or she wants.
Fuchs wrote, “And reporters should have been lying in wait, ready to pounce, prod and, in the end, write about what larger issues this — once more — great though possibly stalled retailer must have faced. I couldn’t wait. Schultz is as skilled in managing a company as he is in managing himself in front of Wall Street. Unfortunately, too, he is as skilled in managing the press as anyone capable of a transparently distracting gesture has ever been.
“Cue Sir Paul.
“The coffeehouse chain announced that it would be getting into the music-production business — and at a high level, with the ex-Beatle’s next album its first effort.
“This is interesting, worth mentioning and could probably, if it works, help the company a bit. However, the real issue of whether its brand is on the run remains.
“So how did the business media handle the balance?
“You really didn’t ask that, did you?
“Take a bunch of baby boomer reporters, wheel McCartney out in front of a camera so he can wave to them on a television screen and, oh boy, do they lose what should have been the major focus of the meeting.”
Read more here.
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…
The Fund for American Studies presented James Bennet of The Economist with the Kenneth Y. Tomlinson Award…
The Wall Street Journal is experimenting with AI-generated article summaries that appear at the top…
Zach Cohen is joining Bloomberg Tax to cover the fiscal cliff and tax issues on…