Some interesting comments coming out in response to the front-page article in the Wall Street Journal earlier this week written by one of the reporters who was spied upon by Hewlett-Packard Co.
First, Peter Cohan on BloggingStocks.com wrote, “There are many levels of irony in this story. Reporters do all sorts of investigations on their subjects. I don’t know how they cultivate their anonymous sources to dig up the details that they report. But my hunch is that while they’re often snoops — peering into places where their targets would prefer they did not — reporters don’t resort to the kind of tactics (pre-trash inspections or monitoring phone calls and IM sessions) to which Tam was subjected.
“But I can’t help but think that Tam’s subjects share some of the same fears of being investigated that she must have felt when she began to realize that HP was placing her under surveillance. Her article’s cool, almost tongue-in-cheek tone does not reveal these fears explicitly, instead leaving them to the reader’s imagination.”
Read more here.
John Carney on Dealbreaker.com responded to Cohan’s post with the following: “We get the point—what’s good for the goose is good for the duck, or whatever. We at DealBreaker certainly aren’t against reporting on reporters. Actually, we’re really into it. But, look, it’s a bit of an understatement to say that “reporters don’t resort to the kind of tactics…to which Tam was subjected.â€? Uhm, that’s right they don’t. Pretending to be someone you’re not, stealing phone records and attempting to tap into other forms of personal communications are not just things reporters don’t do…they’re things that can, will and have gotten reporters fired from respectable news organizations. This is the equivalent of espionage, not reporting.
“Let’s not encourage our paranoid corporate leaders to think that H-P spying is on anywhere near the same moral plane as business reporting.”
Read more here.
The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations has lambasted Russia over its continued detention of…
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Thursday: Today we announced…
Clare Malone of The New York writes about Hunterbrook, which is using reporting from journalists to…
The Hollywood Reporter awards editor Tyler Coates is leaving the news organization. His last day will be…
Laura Purkess has been promoted to consumer features editor at The Sun. She will maintain…
Pat Ferrier, senior business reporter at the Coloradoan in Fort Collins, is retiring after 23…
View Comments
This is quite amusing;
"Pretending to be someone you’re not, stealing phone records and attempting to tap into other forms of personal communications are not just things reporters don’t do…they’re things that can, will and have gotten reporters fired from respectable news organizations."
From what I recall, the firings of reporters only take place when a scandal forces such action as if "we will fire somebody if he is caught doing it". Remember, the financial press was subpoenaed by the SEC and refused citing privilege. The H-P scandal only erupted after getting caught and where evidence is obtained to support the allegations. Reporters simply deny access to the evidence making it harder to prove the allegations.
Oh what a wonderfully convenient world they live.