The Freedom of the Press Foundation writes, “This approach makes a lot of sense from the standpoint of civil duty. They’re called public records for a reason, after all. And access to public documents is more important than ever at this moment, with government websites and records disappearing, Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency doing its best to operate outside the public’s view, and the National Archives in disarray.
“But some may argue that, from a business standpoint, not charging for stories primarily relying on public records automatically means fewer subscriptions and therefore less revenue. We disagree. Sure, the FOIA process is time- and labor-intensive. Reporters face stonewalling, baseless denials, lengthy appeals processes, and countless other obstacles and delays. Investigative reports based on public records are among the most expensive stories to produce and share with the public.
“And yes, publishers rely on subscriptions to cover those costs — which will only increase as a result of anti-press attacks by the Trump administration. But while some readers might not subscribe to outlets that give away some of their best journalism for free, it’s just as possible that readers will recognize this sacrifice and reward these outlets with more traffic and subscriptions in the long run.”
Read more here.
Morning Brew is looking for a reporter to join a new B2B publication that is…
Virginia Business magazine has hired Josh Janney as an associate editor. He previously was a city reporter…
Barron's editor in chief David Cho sent out the following on Tuesday: All, We're thrilled to announce…
Bloomberg Industry Group announced Tuesday that it will have nine summer interns in its newsroom.…
Aime Williams is returning to the trade beat for the Financial Times, and she will continue…
Bloomberg Industry Group has hired Zainab Mudallal as a senior digital editor. She has been senior operations…