Christian writes, “Google’s current position is that it’s not limiting the visibility of online material in searches simply because it was generated using AI, but instead trying to promote content on the basis that it’s helpful to users.
“‘Our ranking team focuses on the usefulness of content, rather than how the content is produced,’ the company’s public search liaison Danny Sullivan said after CNET‘s use of AI first came to light. ‘This allows us to create solutions that aim to reduce all types of unhelpful content in Search, whether it’s produced by humans or through automated processes.’
“He later clarified, though, that content ‘created with the aim of gaming search ranking — regardless of if it’s produced by humans or AI — is still spam and will be treated as such.'”
Read more here.
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
The Financial Times has hired Barbara Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels. She will start…