Categories: Media Moves

Coverage: What’s behind the price increase of an EpiPen?

Mylan NV is coming under media scrutiny because since 2007, the price of an EpiPen — used to treat anaphylactic shock in allergy victims and people with asthma — has quietly risen 400 percent.

Jacqueline Howard of CNN had the news:

The EpiPen is an auto-injector that delivers epinephrine, more commonly known as adrenaline, a hormone that can help to relax muscles. It can open the airways, and reduce swelling during a severe allergic reaction.

Indeed, the price of an EpiPen standard two-pack gradually grew to about $600. The same two-pack cost only about $100 in 2009.

Meanwhile, epinephrine, which can be purchased alone, costs just a few dollars. The EpiPen, manufactured by the pharmaceutical company Mylan, offers a portable way to administer doses. “Some patients and physicians are resorting to buying epinephrine ampoules and filling their own syringes,” said Dr. Thomas Casale, a professor of medicine at the University of South Florida and executive vice president of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology(AAAAI).

Many adults and families of children with severe allergies are facing sticker shock when they pay for their EpiPens, especially amid back-to-school season.

Emily Willingham of Forbes.com looked at the marketing strategy behind the pricing:

It’s what the market will bear, so what’s the problem, right? Only this: Somewhere, right now, a cash-strapped parent or budget-limited patient with a severe allergy will skip acquiring an EpiPen. And someday, they will need it in a life-threatening situation involving exposure to a trigger…and they won’t have it. And they will die. Because they couldn’t afford the delivery mechanism for $1 worth of a drug to keep them alive. Two turning points, a death and one company at the crossroads.

According to NBC, Mylan’s profits from selling EpiPens, which they have aggressively, famously marketed with brilliant success, hit $1.2 billion in 2015. That year, Bloomberg reported that the epinephrine-delivery system represented 40% of Mylan’s operating profits. Bloomberg calls Mylan’s marketing of the EpiPen “a textbook case in savvy branding.”

That savvy comes at steep and increasing individual cost. Even after insurance pays, the customer can be out $400 or more for a pack of two pens, a dollar value that can vary depending on how high the deductible is. And most customers need EpiPens for home and at school for their child (Mylan does have a program that offers free EpiPens to U.S. schools). Indeed, guidelines call for prescribing two doses in case the first one fails, which Mylan used as an opportunity to cease selling single pens and begin selling only two-packs.

Jake Novak of CNBC.com looked for a solution to the issue:

Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure we could find a few dozen drug-abuse obsessed people in this country who can and will find a way to abuse their EpiPens. But should the government be acting more aggressively to stop these obviously self-destructive people or should it be concentrating on doing what it can to help the millions of people who are trying to be personally responsible and stay alive? That’s the choice, after all.

And with that in mind, just who is the government protecting by keeping epinephrine auto-injectors by prescription only? It’s obscene and scary that responsible people who want to protect their health have to pay more and go through the tedious and sometimes expensive process of getting a prescription in order to protect those who want to abuse their health and might … just might … choose to use their life-saving drug or device to abuse it.

Over the counter or not, there will still be costs connected to reasonable testing of the auto-injector by government regulators. No one is arguing against that. And the FDA still regulates over-the-counter drugs in many other ways. But OTC medicines put a lot more responsibility into the hands of the actual people who use them. Pharmacists will also need to become more educated about advising customers on the injectors’ proper use and maintenance.

Chris Roush

Chris Roush was the dean of the School of Communications at Quinnipiac University in Hamden, Connecticut. He was previously Walter E. Hussman Sr. Distinguished Professor in business journalism at UNC-Chapel Hill. He is a former business journalist for Bloomberg News, Businessweek, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Tampa Tribune and the Sarasota Herald-Tribune. He is the author of the leading business reporting textbook "Show me the Money: Writing Business and Economics Stories for Mass Communication" and "Thinking Things Over," a biography of former Wall Street Journal editor Vermont Royster.

Recent Posts

Wired senior writer Meaker is departing

Morgan Meaker, a senior writer for Wired covering Europe, is leaving the publication after three…

4 hours ago

CNBC’s head of events departing after 28 years

Nick Dunn, who is currently head of CNBC Events as senior vice president and managing…

5 hours ago

WSJ taps Beaudette to oversee business, finance and economy

Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…

13 hours ago

NY Times taps Searcey to cover wealth and power

New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…

16 hours ago

The evolution of the WSJ beyond finance

Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…

1 day ago

Silicon Valley Biz Journal seeks a reporter

This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…

1 day ago