Dean Starkman of Columbia Journalism Review writes Wednesday that former Wall Street Journal managing editor Marcus Brauchli would bring questions about his tenure at the paper if he became the Washongton Post’s executiev editor because of his failure to use the agreement designed to protect the Journal from interference by News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch.
Starkman writes, “In April, Brauchli abruptly resigned and wrote a letter to the staff saying he ‘had come to believe the new owners should have a managing editor of their choosing.’
“Okay, but here’s the problem. If Brauchli believed the new owners’ ideas were good, he could have implemented them himself. If he believed they were bad, he could have gone to the committee—a committee unique in the annals of American journalism set up expressly for him. But he didn’t do either.
“One could argue, I suppose, that there was no principle at stake—that it was merely a question of new owners’ wanting their own format, style, aesthetic, what have you, that it really wasn’t a question of the basic editorial direction of the paper. But that’s not right. It was all about editorial direction.
“Then one could argue that editorial direction doesn’t matter, but that would be a strange thing for an editor to say.”
OLD Media Moves
Brauchli would bring baggage to Washington Post
June 25, 2008
Dean Starkman of Columbia Journalism Review writes Wednesday that former Wall Street Journal managing editor Marcus Brauchli would bring questions about his tenure at the paper if he became the Washongton Post’s executiev editor because of his failure to use the agreement designed to protect the Journal from interference by News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch.
Starkman writes, “In April, Brauchli abruptly resigned and wrote a letter to the staff saying he ‘had come to believe the new owners should have a managing editor of their choosing.’
“Okay, but here’s the problem. If Brauchli believed the new owners’ ideas were good, he could have implemented them himself. If he believed they were bad, he could have gone to the committee—a committee unique in the annals of American journalism set up expressly for him. But he didn’t do either.
“One could argue, I suppose, that there was no principle at stake—that it was merely a question of new owners’ wanting their own format, style, aesthetic, what have you, that it really wasn’t a question of the basic editorial direction of the paper. But that’s not right. It was all about editorial direction.
“Then one could argue that editorial direction doesn’t matter, but that would be a strange thing for an editor to say.”
Read more here.
Full-Time
Fast Company seeks a senior editor
January 15, 2025
Media Moves
NBC News hires Long as a senior editor
January 15, 2025
Media News
WSJ reporter Mandavia departs after three years
January 15, 2025
Media News
MarketWatch.com reporter Lang moves to WSJ
January 15, 2025
Media News
TechCrunch makes a small layoff
January 15, 2025
Subscribe to TBN
Receive updates about new stories in the industry daily or weekly.