Dorothy Parker writes on the MediaPost web site that she believed that the reason the premiere issue of business magazine Conde Nast Portfolio had been panned by many critics it because they naturally hate anyone in the industry who is making more money — or is having lavish amounts of money spent on them.
Parker wrote, “Allowing for my worst instincts, I tried to bring a cruelty-free mind and less jaundiced eyes to the job. But the reading experience was far worse than I expected, in so many infuriating — and even cheesy — ways that I lost count.
“After all, how bad can the business version of Vanity Fair really be?
“Let’s put it this way — the words ‘smug’ and ‘self-satisfied’ don’t begin to cover it, although they describe the magazine pretty well.”
Later, she added, “Let’s get to the Passover question — why is this magazine different from all other magazines? I can’t find an answer. I assumed that with the existence of Forbes and Fortune, both worthy publications, one difference might be that Portfolio would target itself more to a female audience. That does not seem to be the case.”
Read more here. She gives specific examples of what’s to dislike about each article.
Business Insider's Louise Ridley is joining The Female Lead, the women's empowerment charity founded by Tesco Clubcard entrepreneur Edwina…
Aruna Viswanatha has been promoted to Washington enterprise editor. She will report to Damian Paletta.…
Bowdeya Tweh has been promoted to Chicago bureau chief at the Wall Street Journal, reporting…
Fierce Healthcare has promoted Heather Landi to executive editor. She has been a senior editor.…
Business news site Quartz has hired Audrey McNamara as breaking news editor. In her role,…
Mark Stenberg of Adweek looks at how publishers such as Bloomberg and Axios are generating…