Alan Cullison, Rebecca Ballhaus and Dustin Volz won for their story, “Trump Repeatedly Pressed Ukraine to Investigate Biden’s Son.”
The judges wrote, “As described by the New York Times three months later, the Journal’s ‘explosive’ story was the final straw for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Within days the once-reluctant Pelosi initiated an impeachment investigation. The story illuminated what until then had been provocative but vague reports of a whistleblower’s complaint about a Trump call with a foreign leader.
“The Journal reporters wrote with context and sweep and made the implications clear from the start: Trump, the lede said, wanted Zelensky to work with Rudy Giuliani ‘on a probe that could hamper Mr. Trump’s potential 2020 opponent.’ The Journal’s relentless reporting broke new ground and gave the public information that the administration had tried to keep under wraps.”
See all of the winners here.
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
The Financial Times has hired Barbara Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels. She will start…
CNBC.com deputy technology editor Todd Haselton is leaving the news organization for a job at The Verge.…
Note from CNBC Business News senior vice president Dan Colarusso: After more than 27 years…
View Comments
Wow! I met Dustin Voltz the last week of February at an ASU Wall Street Journal workshop on business journalism in downtown Phoenix. He talked about his role in the newspaper, the big story he co-wrote, and his cyber-security and intelligence beat. He graduated with a B.A. in Media and Journalism from Arizona State. He compared Reuters' practice of sending lots of news bits until a big story is ready compared to Bloomberg. He worked for Reuters before joining the Journal.