Hays reports, “Many desk editors at The Journal have been at the paper for several years, according to some online profiles, and having them reapply for their positions, while demeaning, is a way to move people around or to different positions — or move them out. Although it’s unclear if anyone has indeed been laid off entirely, or chose to leave rather than reapply for a position, it’s understood that the reapplication process was open, with others in the newsroom welcome to throw their figurative hats in the ring. Those editors that didn’t get to keep their former editing postings have been or will be offered another role, a process that’s set to wrap up this week. Whether they accept those positions is up to them.
“In an internal memo from late April, editor in chief Gerard Baker characterized the changes as a continuation of The Journal’s ‘WSJ 2020’ reorganization plan around digital and mobile, and reiterated that alterations to editing roles and processes ‘are not an exercise in cost-cutting or in reducing the number — or value — of editors.’ Instead, he said the changes are in favor of ‘efficiency and cohesion,’ as well as a ‘new central editing structure.’
“The Journal is said to have something of a baroque system of editing, a holdover from print-driven days of yore, with even daily web stories said to often go through multiple editors. This seems an effort to change that.”
Read more here.
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
The Financial Times has hired Barbara Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels. She will start…
CNBC.com deputy technology editor Todd Haselton is leaving the news organization for a job at The Verge.…
Note from CNBC Business News senior vice president Dan Colarusso: After more than 27 years…