Robert Teitelman, the editor of The Deal, writes in response to Dean Starkman‘s latest piece in Columbia Journalism Review on the decline of business journalism about why the argument falls flat, particularly because the average consumer has become an investor.
“And, as the business and financial world has grown more complex and global, can we effectively bridge that chasm between the complex realities at play and potential readers who know little, have lost the habit of consuming ‘serious’ journalism and have a million other distractions as near as their cellphones. We can all agree that business journalism can be improved. I have my own kit bag of concerns and fears. But Starkman seems to suggest that reforming journalism shouldn’t be all that hard — that it’s really a matter of realizing what’s gone awry and doing good, of reviving an imagined past. It’s infinitely more difficult than that — and it always has been.
“The notion of a ‘public good’ is hazy and subjective and the province of demagogues and ideologues. Journalism is inevitably a commercial product and must be sold to an audience to survive — never more than today. You cannot force people to read or to understand. These subjects are complex and dynamic. It is exactly like not only recognizing a bubble (no trivial task) but also then managing to convince the world of it: easy in hindsight, fiendishly difficult in real time.”
Read more here.
Dow Jones & Co., the parent of The Wall Street Journal, Barron's, MarketWatch.com and Investor's…
The Wall Street Journal is seeking a White House reporter in Washington, DC, to break…
Ben Pershing, the politics editor of The Wall Street Journal, is leaving the news organization.…
New York Times executive editor Joe Kahn sent out the following on Friday: A January 2010 front…
Brent Jones, the senior vice president of training, culture and community at Dow Jones, is…
The Wall Street Journal is looking for an editor to lead its coverage of logistics…