Dan Froomkin of Nieman Watchdog writes Monday about the lack of coverage about declining home prices.
“This is due to what Baker and other economists call the ‘wealth effect.’ It reflects the fact that when you are feeling rich, you tend to spend more, and when you are feeling poor, you tend to spend less. So, Baker says, for every $1 of housing wealth lost, consumption can be expected to go down 5 to 7 cents.
“What that means is that another trillion-dollar loss in housing wealth — something that could easily happen by next fall — translates to $50 billion to $70 billion less consumption; sort of an anti-stimulus.
“That, in turn, simply adds to the unemployment problem. And when you realize that you can’t stabilize the housing market without people being gainfully employed, you see the vicious cycle we’re in.”
Read more here.
The Wall Street Journal is experimenting with AI-generated article summaries that appear at the top…
Zach Cohen is joining Bloomberg Tax to cover the fiscal cliff and tax issues on…
Larry Avila has been named interim editor for Automotive Dive, an Industry Dive publication. He…
Reuters is seeking an experienced editor to take part in our fact-checking project and support the…
CNBC Make It reporter Ashton Jackson writes about ways to make financial news more accessible to consumers.…
The Society for Advancing Business Editing and Writing announced Wednesday the winners and finalists for…