Lisa Pollack of The Financial Times writes about the difficulty in covering the markets when dealing with sources.
“… now picture that someone, or maybe several someones, call you and claim that so-and-so is distorting the market. Now, this is something your readers would be no doubt interested to know. But of course, you need to do more research. Figure out who’s telling the truth. Is this just one angry person with a vendetta (and a trading position to match) or is this the tip of an iceberg?
“If it turns out to be an iceberg, then it’s a matter of serious, justifiable interest. But what if there are only a few people who can verify the allegation? And what if they are only guessing anyway? Should you report on guesses when numbers of guessers are large enough? What is enough evidence, really?
“In financial markets, when there are so many factors at play, how confident can one ever be about what caused a given movement in a stock, yield, or credit spread anyway?”
Read more here.
Atlanta Business Chronicle editor in chief Doug Sams has left the publication and has been replaced by…
Bloomberg News reporter Nadia Lopez has been hired by Axios to write a San Francisco newsletter. She…
Climate change is driving incalculable transformation around the world, and its impacts will only accelerate…
Here are the business news-related winners from the annual EPPY Awards, given out by Editor…
The Special Assignment Reporter for ACBJ will join our editorial team based in Charlotte and…
Bloomberg News is looking for an experienced reporter to lead high-impact coverage of US immigration…