James Ledbetter, the editor of The Big Money, writes Tuesday about how one of the site’s reporter’s broke a big story on Wal-Mart Stores Inc., but that the major business media have yet to follow — for a reason.
Ledbetter writes, “There may be a variety of reasons, but I suspect the main one is that Wal-Mart itself has yet to make an official announcement. The company has planned to officially release the information on Thursday, and in recent days has granted interviews to a few journalists who agreed to embargo the information until Thursday.
“Gunther, it should be said, did not violate the embargo, since he never agreed to a Wal-Mart interview in the first place. Rather, he assembled his story by interviewing the wide network of people who are working with Wal-Mart on this massive undertaking.
“The situation puts a new wrinkle on an old journalistic query: What’s the point of upholding an embargo if thousands of people have already read the news? It can’t be, in this case, any concern that the facts in Gunther’s story are wildly wrong. Neither do I anticipate that places like the Times and the Journal are going to have extraordinary perspective on this piece that’s lacking in Gunther’s story; there is no journalist in America who knows more about corporate sustainability efforts than Gunther.
“No, I think the only purpose now served by maintaining the embargo is to avoid pissing off Wal-Mart.”
OLD Media Moves
The compliant business press
July 14, 2009
James Ledbetter, the editor of The Big Money, writes Tuesday about how one of the site’s reporter’s broke a big story on Wal-Mart Stores Inc., but that the major business media have yet to follow — for a reason.
Ledbetter writes, “There may be a variety of reasons, but I suspect the main one is that Wal-Mart itself has yet to make an official announcement. The company has planned to officially release the information on Thursday, and in recent days has granted interviews to a few journalists who agreed to embargo the information until Thursday.
“Gunther, it should be said, did not violate the embargo, since he never agreed to a Wal-Mart interview in the first place. Rather, he assembled his story by interviewing the wide network of people who are working with Wal-Mart on this massive undertaking.
“The situation puts a new wrinkle on an old journalistic query: What’s the point of upholding an embargo if thousands of people have already read the news? It can’t be, in this case, any concern that the facts in Gunther’s story are wildly wrong. Neither do I anticipate that places like the Times and the Journal are going to have extraordinary perspective on this piece that’s lacking in Gunther’s story; there is no journalist in America who knows more about corporate sustainability efforts than Gunther.
“No, I think the only purpose now served by maintaining the embargo is to avoid pissing off Wal-Mart.”
Read more here.
Media News
The Information hires Brown as senior finance editor
January 9, 2025
Full-Time
Globe and Mail seeks a New York correspondent
January 9, 2025
Media News
Bloomberg Industry union: We want respect
January 9, 2025
Media News
City AM is ending its Monday print edition
January 9, 2025
Media News
Johnson says goodbye to WSJ colleagues
January 9, 2025
Subscribe to TBN
Receive updates about new stories in the industry daily or weekly.