Howard Kurtz of the Washington Post writes Monday about the changes that have occurred in the past few years at The Wall Street Journal as it prepares to launch a New York edition to do battle with The New York Times.
“Journal Managing Editor Robert Thomson, a Murdoch confidant brought in from another News Corp. property, the Times of London, declined to be interviewed. He is, like his boss, a native of Australia and has criticized the Times as politically ‘skewed.’
“Thomson has gradually transformed the nation’s preeminent business publication into more of a general-interest newspaper. By edging toward more political and cultural stories and away from its laserlike focus on corporate America, some Journal insiders say, the paper is relinquishing its core franchise. Other staffers, impressed by Murdoch’s investments in the paper, have come to believe that he isn’t just pursuing a vanity play.
“While the Journal was once content to be a second read, Steiger says, ‘in the current print environment, you have to think of becoming a first read for at least some of your audience.'”
Read more here.
Fox Business host Larry Kudlow has no plans to leave his role amid reports detailing…
Morgan Meaker, a senior writer for Wired covering Europe, is leaving the publication after three…
Nick Dunn, who is currently head of CNBC Events as senior vice president and managing…
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
View Comments
This might not be a bad idea. As a subscriber, I now like the WSJ's broader news coverage and I definitely see it as a complement/competitor to the New York Times.
On the other hand, as a consumer of business news, I also miss the extensive business coverage and I go online to find the news I need-- but, would I have done that anyway, given the rise of subject-specific websites? Maybe I would have. Maybe Murdoch is astutely, consciously deciding to surrender ground he knows he can't hold anyway.
Just a thought. And of course, all this effort ignores News Corp.'s fundamental problem, which is what happens to the company after Murdoch dies or goes senile. I shudder to think of the King Lear references that are coming.