Brett Arends, who writes a column for WSJ.com and Marketwatch.com, questions Wednesday why readers take financial advice from writers.
“Foolish? Definitely. But — here’s the weird part — I don’t regret it. I genuinely don’t. I absolutely love writing about finance and markets and money. Like so many people in this business, I’m just going to keep going as long as I can.
“Journalism isn’t really a job or a career. It’s more of a personality disorder, like obsessive-compulsive behavior, alcoholism or kleptomania. Instead of graduate schools, we need treatment centers.
“So should you really take financial advice from anyone silly enough to write for a living? Well, of course, it depends on the advice. But here’s a partial defense of writers: The thing to understand about us is that we’re not stupid. We’re just a bit crazy.”
Read more here.
The Fund for American Studies presented James Bennet of The Economist with the Kenneth Y. Tomlinson Award…
The Wall Street Journal is experimenting with AI-generated article summaries that appear at the top…
Zach Cohen is joining Bloomberg Tax to cover the fiscal cliff and tax issues on…
Larry Avila has been named interim editor for Automotive Dive, an Industry Dive publication. He…
Reuters is seeking an experienced editor to take part in our fact-checking project and support the…
CNBC Make It reporter Ashton Jackson writes about ways to make financial news more accessible to consumers.…