Researchers at the University of Amsterdam and the University of Luxembourg asked subjects to estimate the future stock prices of 12 companies based on the historical prices of each stock and a newspaper article published about the company in the New York Times and Financial Times. Some readers were given articles that included positive references while other readers were given articles that included negative references.
“Our results show that subjects on average expect a significantly higher (lower) future stock return after reading news that highlight positive (negative) and attenuate negative (positive) facts,” according to the study.
The researchers argue that the news media may be able to manipulate an investor’s perception of the content of financial news by drawing readers’ attention to one fact “while taking it away from another via salient stimuli such as modifier words.”
The study found a bigger effect when the subjects read an article with a negative reference. Readers expected a bigger stock price movement — albeit downward — after reading those articles.
“We suggest that when stocks perform poorly, subjects search for additional salient hints in the news media in order to predict the next period price and are more prone to react to modifier words,” the study states.
For a copy of the study, go here.
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…
The Fund for American Studies presented James Bennet of The Economist with the Kenneth Y. Tomlinson Award…
The Wall Street Journal is experimenting with AI-generated article summaries that appear at the top…
Zach Cohen is joining Bloomberg Tax to cover the fiscal cliff and tax issues on…
Larry Avila has been named interim editor for Automotive Dive, an Industry Dive publication. He…