The winners of the 13th annual Society of American Business Editors and Writers Best in Business Awards were named Thursday, and they include winners in the magazine categories for the first time.
The Arizona Republic, Los Angeles Times, New York Times and USA Today won in the general excellence category for newspapers with a circulation above 325,000.
The Miami Herald, Rocky Mountain News and Seattle Times won in the general excellence category for newspapers with circulation between 225,000 and 325,000.
The Charlotte Observer, The Des Moines Register, The Detroit News, Grand Rapids Press and Seattle Post-Intelligencer won in the general excellence category for newspapers between 125,000 and 225,000 circulation.
The Arizona Daily Star (Tucson, Ariz.), The News Tribune (Tacoma, Wash.), and The Press Democrat (Santa Rosa, Calif.) won in the general excellence category for newspapers with a circulation of less than 125,000.
In the business weekly category, the winners were Advertising Age, Boston Business Journal, Crain’s New York Business, Financial Week, and Triangle Business Journal.
All of the winners can be found here.
The Yale Program on Stakeholder Innovation and Management announced the appointment of Alan Murray, departing chief…
The Advocate is looking for a savvy reporter to cover the Baton Rouge business scene…
MLex, a LexisNexis company, is an independent news organization for breaking news and forward-looking analysis…
The Austin Business Journal seeks a staff writer to cover economic development in one of…
A Russian court on Saturday placed Sergei Mingazov, a journalist for the Russian edition of…
Justin Nielsen of Investor's Business Daily writes about the newspaper's 40th anniversary. Nielsen writes, "When the…
View Comments
i actually counted: 118 winners. ok, maybe i missed -- since that is such a huge number.
That doesn't include the students -- or the certificates of merit.
Come on. 118 winners???? Isn't that a bit too self-indulgent??? How about limiting the winners to ONE per category? And how about limiting the categories.
Yeah, it's particularly ridiculous because about 20 papers are even eligible to compete in each of the top two circulation categories for 'general excellence.' I don't know how many of those papers submitted entries, but fully 12 of those 40 were honored.
12 of 40!
So many of these contests strike me as just a way of luring people to the associated conventions.