New York Times business editor Larry Ingrassia responded online Wednesday to a reader’s suggestion that the business media didn’t do enough to warn consumers about the economic crisis by noting a number of stories in the newspaper that did just that in recent years.
“Maybe some people didn’t read our stories, or don’t remember reading them, but we were writing them. Lots of them.”
Later, Ingrassia pointed out, “Could the crisis have been averted if we had written even more? I wish we had as much power as you suggest. We have covered the excesses of executive compensation, well, excessively, including in the ‘Gilded Paychecks‘ series I mentioned in an earlier answer, yet executive pay kept rising.
“I can assure you that we will stay on the beat, and continue to do the type of enterprising and investigating reporting that puts the spotlight on important issues and potential problems. But it is up to regulators and legislators to take it from there.”
Read more here.
Morgan Meaker, a senior writer for Wired covering Europe, is leaving the publication after three…
Nick Dunn, who is currently head of CNBC Events as senior vice president and managing…
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…