NYT’s public editor slams Nocera column on Buffett
May 9, 2014
Posted by Chris Roush
Margaret Sullivan, the public editor at the New York Times, is critical of columnist Joe Nocera for his recent writing about billionaire investor Warren Buffett.
Sullivan writes, “It’s understood that nobody needs to feel sorry for Mr. Buffett, one of the world’s wealthiest people, nor does he suggest anything of the kind. ‘I’ve got more ability to respond than most,’ he told me, in an understatement. Given his stature, his actions are fair game for legitimate criticism. But if you’re going to impugn someone’s integrity, you’d better have your facts straight.
“In this instance, because the second column is so intrinsically flawed, a standard correction didn’t get the job done. Mr. Nocera should have devoted at least part of another column to telling his readers what happened and why. In his email to me, Mr. Nocera referred to the second column’s fundamental mistake as ‘bad/dumb/embarrassing.’
“Such a forthright admission should not be confined to an email answer to the public editor’s question, but should be published in the same Times pages where the two columns ran. Ideally, the online version of the second column would provide a clear link to the mea culpa. That would go a long way toward making this right.”
OLD Media Moves
NYT’s public editor slams Nocera column on Buffett
May 9, 2014
Posted by Chris Roush
Margaret Sullivan, the public editor at the New York Times, is critical of columnist Joe Nocera for his recent writing about billionaire investor Warren Buffett.
Sullivan writes, “It’s understood that nobody needs to feel sorry for Mr. Buffett, one of the world’s wealthiest people, nor does he suggest anything of the kind. ‘I’ve got more ability to respond than most,’ he told me, in an understatement. Given his stature, his actions are fair game for legitimate criticism. But if you’re going to impugn someone’s integrity, you’d better have your facts straight.
“In this instance, because the second column is so intrinsically flawed, a standard correction didn’t get the job done. Mr. Nocera should have devoted at least part of another column to telling his readers what happened and why. In his email to me, Mr. Nocera referred to the second column’s fundamental mistake as ‘bad/dumb/embarrassing.’
“Such a forthright admission should not be confined to an email answer to the public editor’s question, but should be published in the same Times pages where the two columns ran. Ideally, the online version of the second column would provide a clear link to the mea culpa. That would go a long way toward making this right.”
Read more here.
Full-Time
WSJ seeks India correspondent
July 10, 2026
Media News
National Press Foundation offering local biz journalism workshop
July 10, 2026
Media News
FT’s Cumbo departing after 27 years
July 10, 2026
Media News
NY Times biz editor moving to new role
July 9, 2026
Media News
Reilly named editor of Minneapolis/St. Paul Biz Journal
July 9, 2026
Subscribe to TBN
Receive updates about new stories in the industry daily or weekly.