Michael Wolff writes on Newser about how the New York Times‘ coverage of the economy has suddenly become overly positive.
“So can the Times make business positive again — does it have that kind of juice left? Can it plant the suggestion in its audience of doctors and lawyers and West Siders (and those status-conscious people in the Twin Cities who get the national edition) that they’ll be missing out if they don’t jump back in? That up is the certain direction? And would dedicated optimism at the Times force the Wall Street Journal into step? That would be an interesting competitive face-off: What would you rather buy, pessimism or optimism?
“Now, it is just as logical that the Times is simply looking for a turn or reversal in the story. Recession-depression has become rather old hat. It has to go somewhere; we need development. And, give the president credit, the economy doesn’t seem to be headed, at least at the moment, for another plunge. Which is, with some interpretation, almost a recovery. No?”
Read more here.
Fox Business host Larry Kudlow has no plans to leave his role amid reports detailing…
Morgan Meaker, a senior writer for Wired covering Europe, is leaving the publication after three…
Nick Dunn, who is currently head of CNBC Events as senior vice president and managing…
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…