Marketwatch media columnist Jon Friedman writes Friday, the 20th anniversary of the 1987 stock market crash, that Wall Street got off easy in terms of the media coverage of the event and doubts the same would happen today.
“You could make the case that today’s business reporters have a deeper understanding of how the markets behave. They’d be better equipped to explain why the stock market collapsed and what it might need to recover.
“Having the events of the relatively recent October 1987 and afterward as a blueprint, the media could trace the historical implications of a stock market crash. Remember, 58 years — a lifetime — elapsed between the destructions of 1929 and 1987.
“‘Financial journalists are more willing to engage in understanding the mechanics of the market and explain why it may behave the way it does,’Â [Rob]Â Cox of Breakingviews.com said. ‘So, if we are willing to get a handle on things like portfolio insurance, statistical arbitrage etc., we can avoid some of the breathless, sensational markets coverage that reinforced the sense of panic among investors. At least, I hope we can!'”
Read more here.
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
The Financial Times has hired Barbara Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels. She will start…
CNBC.com deputy technology editor Todd Haselton is leaving the news organization for a job at The Verge.…
Note from CNBC Business News senior vice president Dan Colarusso: After more than 27 years…
Members of the CoinDesk editorial team have sent a letter to the CEO of its…