Tess Vigeland talks to Reuters blogger Felix Salmon about how to make sense of the conflicting headlines coming from business journalism.
Here is an excerpt:
SALMON: The New York Times was particularly alarmist, and all of this talk about Dow 1,000 — which of course is ridiculous. I mean, it’s pretty much physically impossible, given where the Dow divisor is to even get to Dow 1,000. You just can’t have stocks trading at that level. It’s basically giving people permission to panic, and that’s really not very helpful.
VIGELAND: It’s not. Frankly, I don’t find any of this very helpful. But people do read the newspaper and they do follow things like this, despite the fact that we tell everybody your personal finances are very individual and you can’t try to predict what’s going to happen.
SALMON: Especially not by reading a random piece in the New York Times, talking about a guy who draws lines on charts and then pulls a number out of thin air. These things are not based on any real fundamental analysis, he’s not an economist. Even if he was an economist, you probably really shouldn’t listen to him, because economists are notoriously bad at forecasting anything. But this guy basically just draws lines on charts. He’s an astrologer.
Read more here.
Jared Serre, a tax reporter at Law360, is leaving the news organization next month. He…
Lauren Silva Laughlin, U.S. editor of Reuters Breakingviews, sent out the following on Tuesday: I’m…
The Wall Street Journal has hired two new staffers and promoted a current staffer. They…
Fortune magazine has launched "Ask Andy," a bi-weekly advice column for entrepreneurs and start-up founders.…
The Wall Street Journal is looking for a full time senior publishing editor to join…
The Wall Street Journal is looking for an experienced and determined reporter to join our…