Hugo Lindgren, who became editor of The New York Times Magazine, writes about Joe Nocera, who recently moved from a Times business columnist position to the editorial page.
Lindgren writes, “Last fall, he was a top candidate for the job as editor of this
“This was, of course, completely self-serving on my part. I wanted Joe on my team. As a business journalist and a magazine maker, he has few peers. He has worked at a ton of top-notch places — Washington Monthly, Texas Monthly, Newsweek, Esquire, GQ and Fortune — and he’s not even that old and creaky. Somehow he also found the time to write “All the Devils Are Here”, an excellent account of the financial crisis, with Bethany McLean.
“More impressive than Joe’s resume is his winningly blunt, acerbic personality. He started coming to our weekly ideas meetings, and he shook them up every time. Few of us will ever forget the hourlong war of words he incited over the merits of Malcolm Gladwell’s journalism. It was incredible fun. In private, Joe’s counsel to me has been clear and consistent: Don’t worry about the magazine other people want you to make. Make the magazine you want to read. Trust your instincts. Oh, and make sure to assign me lots of big features.”
Read more here.
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
The Financial Times has hired Barbara Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels. She will start…
View Comments
A story that could only have beeen written about a man. A female journalist, no matter how impressive her resume, with a "blunt, acerbic personality" who incited a "war of words" would get far less flattering coverage.