Charles Warner, who teaches media management classes and who blogs at Media Curmudgeon.com, notes several errors in the current Fortune cover story on Facebook.
“And to write in a magazine that purports to be credible that ‘attempts to sell traditional online ads on Facebook and other social-networking sites have failed miserably’ flies in the face of the facts. The two leading social-networking sites will sell over $1 billion in advertising this year. MySpace is expected to do over $750 million in ad revenue in 2009 and Facebook about $250 million. Some failure. And I’m sure Zuckerberg was pleased to read that ‘members ignore’ ads on his precious site (which is untrue to the tune of $250 million).”
Read more here. It should be noted that Warner’s post on Huffington Post implies that Carol Loomis no longer works for Fortune, when she is still a writer there. And he misspelled the name of former GE CEO Jack Welch.
CNBC is throwing its weight behind its nascent CNBC Sport brand, bringing its sports business coverage to…
Ken Bensinger of The New York Times writes about how right-leaning media organizations have not emphasized…
Reuters tech reporter Raphael Satter has sued the Indian government after his Indian overseas citizenship was cancelled,…
The New York State Society of CPAs is accepting entries for its annual Excellence in…
Vikas Kumar, a senior editor at The Capitol Forum, writes about how a company, Zynex,…
Variety has promoted Ellise Shafer to deputy editor of international. William Earl of Variety writes, "Shafer, who has…
View Comments
CPM=cost per thousand WHAT? Impressions? Clicks? The article never says.