Dvorkin writes, “The reaction to our testing was swift. A handful or two of our ad-blocking visitors who got the message took their criticisms to Twitter. Staffers, fearing fewer readers for their work, expressed worried confusion. So did a few contributors who are part of our audience-based incentive pay model. Notably, the most concerned contributors were those who write about video games as gamers wereearly users of ad blocking technology. We also heard from contributors who post through ad-blocking corporate networks. They’ve been unable to double-check their published work. We’re still working through these concerns.
“We’ve also been made aware of numerous glitches in our testing. In some cases, our messaging and execution was inconsistent — turning off the blocker still blocked a visitor or leaving it on still permitted access. Other public reports of issues are also being monitored, with as of yet no confirmed direct correlation with our ad blocking tests.
“The data so far has taught us a lot:
2) 903,000, or 42.4%, of those visitors turned off the blockers and received a thank you message.
3) We monetized 15 million ad impressions that would otherwise have been blocked.
As important, the ad-light experience has focused our attention on faster delivery of our digital screens to consumers.”
Read more here.
The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations has lambasted Russia over its continued detention of…
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Thursday: Today we announced…
Clare Malone of The New York writes about Hunterbrook, which is using reporting from journalists to…
The Hollywood Reporter awards editor Tyler Coates is leaving the news organization. His last day will be…
Laura Purkess has been promoted to consumer features editor at The Sun. She will maintain…
Pat Ferrier, senior business reporter at the Coloradoan in Fort Collins, is retiring after 23…