Dvorkin writes, “The reaction to our testing was swift. A handful or two of our ad-blocking visitors who got the message took their criticisms to Twitter. Staffers, fearing fewer readers for their work, expressed worried confusion. So did a few contributors who are part of our audience-based incentive pay model. Notably, the most concerned contributors were those who write about video games as gamers wereearly users of ad blocking technology. We also heard from contributors who post through ad-blocking corporate networks. They’ve been unable to double-check their published work. We’re still working through these concerns.
“We’ve also been made aware of numerous glitches in our testing. In some cases, our messaging and execution was inconsistent — turning off the blocker still blocked a visitor or leaving it on still permitted access. Other public reports of issues are also being monitored, with as of yet no confirmed direct correlation with our ad blocking tests.
“The data so far has taught us a lot:
2) 903,000, or 42.4%, of those visitors turned off the blockers and received a thank you message.
3) We monetized 15 million ad impressions that would otherwise have been blocked.
As important, the ad-light experience has focused our attention on faster delivery of our digital screens to consumers.”
Read more here.
Fox Business host Larry Kudlow has no plans to leave his role amid reports detailing…
Morgan Meaker, a senior writer for Wired covering Europe, is leaving the publication after three…
Nick Dunn, who is currently head of CNBC Events as senior vice president and managing…
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…