Jeff Bercovici of DailyFinance.com wants to know how The Wall Street Journal, which lost more than $80 million in 2009, is now expected to report a profit one year later.
“The simplest explanation would be if that $80 million included the $60 million Murdoch reportedly spent to relocate the Journal from its old digs at the World Financial Center to shiny new offices in News Corp.’s (NWS) headquarters building in midtown Manhattan.
“The Journal spokeswoman wouldn’t comment on how the expense of the move was accounted for, but a glance at News Corp.’s 10-K filing for fiscal 2009 suggests that at least some of the cost was assigned to the parent company, not the paper: The company reported $126 million in liabilities related to executive separation payments and lease terminations as part of something called the Dow Jones Integration Plan.”
“How to get to the bottom of this? If only there were some large newspaper that specialized in financial analysis…”
Read more here.
Fox Business host Larry Kudlow has no plans to leave his role amid reports detailing…
Morgan Meaker, a senior writer for Wired covering Europe, is leaving the publication after three…
Nick Dunn, who is currently head of CNBC Events as senior vice president and managing…
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…