The Financial Times is mulling whether to charge consumers for access to its video content, reports Laura Oliver of Journalism.co.UK.
“‘It’s not a given that video should be free. Some of the most valuable content we have is video content,’ he said, adding that the value comes from both user engagement and a premium on video advertising.
‘”We’re going to see a transition of video behind that paywall, but it’s going to be a gradual thing over the next few months.’
“Describing the FT’s approach to video, Pinches said there is a question of how to add value to analysis and thought-led pieces through visual imagery. Figures from the title’s iPhone app which have suggested people spend an average of 14 minutes using the application, are a positive sign for long-form multimedia content, including video, he added.”
Read more here.
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…
The Fund for American Studies presented James Bennet of The Economist with the Kenneth Y. Tomlinson Award…
The Wall Street Journal is experimenting with AI-generated article summaries that appear at the top…
View Comments
Or I could just turn on CNBC, Bloomberg, BBC or even Fox Business (yuck) for, you know, free.