Moses writes, “Advertisers have to spend $250,000 in native plus display over 60 days (up from the minimum BrandVoice package of $150,000). If they don’t get a lift in at least one of four metrics (awareness, favorability, recall, purchase intent), they get their money back. The advertiser gets to pick the vendor to measure the campaign’s impact.
“Of course, the money-back guarantee shtick is marketing. Forbes seems to know how to control the risk of its guarantees. It introduced its original display ad guarantee in 2002 to address doubts about the effectiveness of display ads. It ran with more 100 campaigns over several years until Forbes stopped offering it around 2010. Mark Howard, Forbes’ chief revenue officer, said Forbes only had to issue one refund, to a financial advertiser. It was in 2008, at the height of the financial meltdown.
“Howard said the guarantee was a response to the market’s desire for accountability as well as the increased competition. Other publishers charge for native based on views (and at least one, the Daily Mail, guarantees views), and there have been performance guarantees on print ads, but Forbes believes its promise is a first for native.”
Read more here.
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…
The Fund for American Studies presented James Bennet of The Economist with the Kenneth Y. Tomlinson Award…
The Wall Street Journal is experimenting with AI-generated article summaries that appear at the top…
Zach Cohen is joining Bloomberg Tax to cover the fiscal cliff and tax issues on…