Moses writes, “Advertisers have to spend $250,000 in native plus display over 60 days (up from the minimum BrandVoice package of $150,000). If they don’t get a lift in at least one of four metrics (awareness, favorability, recall, purchase intent), they get their money back. The advertiser gets to pick the vendor to measure the campaign’s impact.
“Of course, the money-back guarantee shtick is marketing. Forbes seems to know how to control the risk of its guarantees. It introduced its original display ad guarantee in 2002 to address doubts about the effectiveness of display ads. It ran with more 100 campaigns over several years until Forbes stopped offering it around 2010. Mark Howard, Forbes’ chief revenue officer, said Forbes only had to issue one refund, to a financial advertiser. It was in 2008, at the height of the financial meltdown.
“Howard said the guarantee was a response to the market’s desire for accountability as well as the increased competition. Other publishers charge for native based on views (and at least one, the Daily Mail, guarantees views), and there have been performance guarantees on print ads, but Forbes believes its promise is a first for native.”
Read more here.
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Thursday: I'm delighted to share the…
Business Insider has hired Pranav Dixit to cover Meta, the parent of Facebook and Instagram. He will…
Five veteran journalists have been named the latest recipients of the McGraw Fellowship for Business Journalism.…
Neil Cavuto, the first anchor hired by Fox News in 1996, is leaving the network,…
WIRED is looking for an experienced, collaborative, deeply invested leader to oversee our ambitious, award-winning…
Ankler, which covers the entertainment industry, has hired Alison Brower as its executive editor. Brower was…