Lauren Kirchner of Columbia Journalism Review is worried about what Forbes‘ new strategy where every writer will have a blog will mean to the business magazine.
“Another important difference, though, between the original True/Slant experiment and this new iteration of Forbes.com is that True/Slant was a completely blank slate, but Forbes is a well established news institution. Forbes is already its own brand, already has a readership, and that readership has certain expectations.
“The danger of an ‘everyone blogs’ edict is that it might dilute that brand, which can play out in at least two ways. One, reporters may find themselves distracted by the hungry beast of the blog and less able to report and write the other, longer stories they had previously devoted their time to. If the quality of the writing goes down, that can counteract the benefits presumed by an uptick in the quantity of the writing. Two, the aforementioned combination of ‘thousands [of] freelance contributors’ and a ‘less layered process’ will loosen editorial control, and, potentially, lessen the quality of the content coming into the site from the outside.”
Read more here.
Washington Post Business Editor Lori Montgomery: We’re delighted to announce that Sandhya Somashekhar, an insightful…
CoinDesk markets reporter Lyllah Ledesma is leaving the news organization after four years for a new opportunity.…
Allie Garfinkle of Fortune, who writes its Term Sheet newsletter, was interviewed by SBS Communications…
STAT News executive editor Rick Berke posted the following: Dear Readers, Please bear with me…
The Oregonian seeks a reporter to tackle real estate news, trends in housing and the…
Al Mannarino, senior podcast producer at Adweek, has left the news organization. He has been…