Jack Flack, who writes about business and spin for the Conde Nast Portfolio web site, writes Thursday that News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch, who bought The Wall Street Journal last year, is smarter than Sam Zell, who bought the Tribune Co., because of what they each purchased.
“Those are great assets, because only the strongest newspapers with compelling brand names will survive the transition to a digital world. Unfortunately, both papers operate in the world of general news, where the competitive set is virtually unlimited, and thus differentiation is extremely difficult.
“The Wall Street Journal, on the other hand, operates as the clear leader in a unique segment—business news.
“As a business, business news is far superior to general news. The audience is affluent, growing, and quite willing to pay for something they perceive of value. Business people value the Journal‘s take on a story over the alternative takes, and can either expense the subscription, or easily pay it themselves.
“That’s why Murdoch is already backing off his initial assumption that he would quickly abandon the WSJ.com’s uniquely successful pay model.”
Read more here.
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
The Financial Times has hired Barbara Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels. She will start…