Clark Hoyt, the public editor of the New York Times, writes Sunday in response to reader’s complaints that the paper’s negative coverage about the economy has contributed to the current crisis.
“Similarly, as comparisons to the 1930s were tossed around, Leonhardt worked with economists at the Bureau of Labor Statistics to construct a broad measure of the job market, the best way to gauge the health of the economy. He found that as bad as things are, they still are not as bad as the recession of 1982, let alone the Great Depression.
“Last week’s economic news was mixed. The stock market, though still at half its peak, rallied, but General Electric’s debt was downgraded. General Motors said it would not need more money from the government this month. Retail sales were down, but not as much as expected. Production in exporting countries around the world is off by staggering amounts. The financial system is still filled with toxic waste from the mortgage meltdown, and the government still has not developed a clear plan for dealing with it.
“The trick for The Times is to keep it all in balance. Larry Ingrassia, the business editor, said: ‘I’ve always thought it important to divorce yourself from whether a story is going to be positive or negative. … Write it and let the chips fall where they fall.'”
Read more here.
Former Business Insider executive editor Rebecca Harrington has been hired by Dynamo to be its…
Bloomberg Television has hired Brenda Kerubo as a desk producer in London. She will be covering Europe's…
In a meeting at CNBC headquarters Thursday afternoon, incoming boss Mark Lazarus presented a bullish…
Ritika Gupta, the BBC's North American business correspondent, was interviewed by Global Woman magazine about…
Rest of World has hired Kinling Lo as a China reporter. Lo was previously a…
Bloomberg News saw strong unique visitor growth to its website in October, passing Fox Business…