Joe Strupp of Editor & Publisher writes Tuesday that no final decision has been made on whether to make The Wall Street Journal‘s web site free, contrary to statements made earlier in the day by News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch.
Strupp interviewed Michael Rooney, senior vice president and chief revenue officer for the Dow Jones’ consumer media group, who said no decision had been made. News Corp. does not close on its acquisition of Dow Jones, the parent of The Wall Street Journal, until next month.
Later, Rooney added, “We want to work and be the biggest, but how do we get there? Let’s work things all out and make the right business decisions. The details of all of this are being analyzed, how much revenue would we lose?”
Read more here.
What a lot of people seem to be missing in this discussion is that there’s already a ton of content on the Wall Street Journal web site that IS free to anyone. Making it a total free site isn’t going to change how a lot of people use the site.
For example, I am NOT a WSJ.com subscriber, and yet I go to the site almost every day and can read plenty of content from the paper. And I post links to that content on this blog — something that the advocates of a free WSJ.com say hurts the web site’s ability to attract more readers. I wonder how many of these free Web site advocates have actually tried to go to WSJ.com and read something.
Wall Street Journal reporter Hannah Miao is moving to Singapore to cover the China economy.…
Financial Times reporter Simon Foy is now covering European banks. He has been covering accounting for the…
Debtwire, the leading provider of global fixed income news, analysis and data for more than…
Amber Kanwar, an anchor for BNN Bloomberg in Canada, is departing at the end of…
Moody's Ratings has promoted Yvette Kantrow to senior vice president and editor in chief. She has been…
Politico reporter Clare Fieseler is leaving the news organization to take on some ocean reporting projects. She…