Paul LaMonica, who writes the Media Biz blog on CNNMoney.com, argues Monday that the acquisition of Dow Jones & Co., the parent of The Wall Street Journal, by News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch is great for his ego, but doesn’t do a whole lot for his shareholders.
“Bank wrote that the Dow Jones deal probably does make some strategic sense — he pointed out that the addition of the WSJ should be ‘a shot in the arm’ for Fox Business Channel. But he conceded that if News Corp. used the same amount of money that its spending on Dow Jones to buy back stock, the company could have increased earnings per share by about 5 cents next year, a move that probably would have pleased investors a lot more.
“And that’s my main point. When you get past the hype about how the Dow Jones deal makes Murdoch an even more influential player in the media business, the numbers just don’t justify this deal. Buying Dow Jones probably will boost Murdoch’s ego. But it probably won’t boost shareholder value for News Corp. investors anytime soon.”
Morgan Meaker, a senior writer for Wired covering Europe, is leaving the publication after three…
Nick Dunn, who is currently head of CNBC Events as senior vice president and managing…
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
This position will be Hybrid in the office/market 3 days per week, and those days…