Richard Perez-Pena of The New York Times writes for Thursday’s paper that for many Wall Street Journal journalists, the decision between whether its parent company Dow Jones & Co. is sold to News Corp. CEO Rupert Murdoch or a joint bid by CNBC parent General Electric Co. and Financial Times parent Pearson comes down to “trash or slash.”
Perez-Pena wrote, “‘If you put a gun to my head, I’d take Murdoch over G.E.-Pearson,’ said a senior editor at The Journal who declined to be identified because the deal is not complete. This editor reasoned that the G.E.-Pearson deal would mean immediate cuts and deteriorating quality, while a Bancroft family deal struck with Mr. Murdoch might hold off fundamental change for a few years.”
Later, Perez-Pena added, “‘I think our history shows that we value and nurture the things that make our acquisitions unique, and we don’t slash and burn,’ said a G. E. executive who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the matter. ‘But obviously, a lot of the strategic value in this would be in consolidation.'”
Read more here.
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
The Financial Times has hired Barbara Moens to cover competition and tech in Brussels. She will start…
CNBC.com deputy technology editor Todd Haselton is leaving the news organization for a job at The Verge.…
Note from CNBC Business News senior vice president Dan Colarusso: After more than 27 years…
Members of the CoinDesk editorial team have sent a letter to the CEO of its…