The Action consumer column that previously ran in the state section of The St. Petersburg Times, has been moved to the business section, writes Suzanne Palmer, who writes the column.
“That’s why you often see complaints and answers presented very directly: the consumer’s side and the business’. I believe readers are smart enough to draw their own conclusions when no resolution is obvious.
“While an inquiry by the press will often prompt a response when none was forthcoming to the reader, Action has no power to subpoena documents, compel sworn testimony or force a business to correct a wrong. That is the bailiwick of the legal system.
“Action will not pressure a business to cave in to unreasonable or unfounded complaints simply because the item may appear in the paper. I specifically counsel against it. There are times when a reader has just done a poor job as a consumer and wants Action to fix it.”
Read more here.Â
PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…