TALKING BIZ NEWS EXCLUSIVE
The Financial Times has an interesting article Thursday about business news channel CNBC and its value to Comcast in its acquisition of parent NBC.
But the story ignored the channel’s recent ratings, which continue to decline.
During the same time period, viewers in the key 25 to 54 age demographic are off 37 percent, down to 60,000.
The same trend exists during the 8 p.m. to 11 p.m. block as well, where CNBC’s viewership is down 34 percent to 183,000 total and down 27 percent to 83,000 in the 25 to 54 demographic.
The question that the FT article doesn’t ask, or answer, is this: Will CNBC continue to be able to make as much money, and charge high ad rates, if its viewership continues to decline?
PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…
CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…
Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…
Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…
Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…
Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…
View Comments
Surely someone who supposedly follows the business media would be well aware that January 2009 was when the Dow plunged over ONE THOUSAND POINTS in the span of 4 weeks.
That, coupled with the transition in government likely gave CNBC an inflated audience.
The FT article was fine; it's your analysis that's lacking.