Categories: OLD Media Moves

CNBC mention — good or bad — helps a company stock price

CNBC is good for a company’s stock price regardless of whether the news is excellent or terrible, according to a new paper from a graduate student at the University of California at Berkeley.

Economics PhD student Reza Shabani writes, “There is a signifi…cant increase in stock price at the precise time that a company is mentioned on CNBC following a positive news event. Surprisingly, there is also a signifi…cant increase in stock price at the precise time that a company is mentioned on CNBC following a negative news event.”

Beginning in June 2009 through March 2011, Shabani recorded the CNBC broadcast on each trading day from 9 a.m. to 7 p.m. eastern time. He used a customized program to extract the closed captions from the video recordings along with an intrasecond time-stamp indicating the precise time at which a caption appears on the screen.

To identify companies, he developed a complex tagging algorithm that accounts for complications such as punctuation, wild cards, and colloquialisms. He found more than 22,000 examples of company news events mentioned, and used transactions data from the NYSE’s Trade-and-Quote database to calculate returns and volume in the 20-minute window surrounding announcements of news events and their subsequent mentions.

Shabani also found a signifi…cant increase in stock price at the precise time a company is mentioned on CNBC following a news event with an expected outcome. This price response is smaller and less statistically signifi…cant than the price response following subsequent mentions of positive and negative news events.

“The evidence implies that at the time of a CNBC mention, some investors are swayed by the opinions of pundits and analysts while others are introduced to an investment opportunity that they had not previously considered,” writes Shabani. “Media influence is strongest when the implications of a news event are more ambiguous and susceptible to a wide range of interpretations, as is likely with expected news events.”

If you’d like to read the full research paper, go here.

Chris Roush

Chris Roush was the dean of the School of Communications at Quinnipiac University in Hamden, Connecticut. He was previously Walter E. Hussman Sr. Distinguished Professor in business journalism at UNC-Chapel Hill. He is a former business journalist for Bloomberg News, Businessweek, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Tampa Tribune and the Sarasota Herald-Tribune. He is the author of the leading business reporting textbook "Show me the Money: Writing Business and Economics Stories for Mass Communication" and "Thinking Things Over," a biography of former Wall Street Journal editor Vermont Royster.

Recent Posts

PCWorld executive editor Ung dies at 58

PCWorld executive editor Gordon Mah Ung, a tireless journalist we once described as a founding father…

12 hours ago

CNBC taps Sullivan as “Power Lunch” co-anchor

CNBC senior vice president Dan Colarusso sent out the following on Monday: Before this year comes to…

2 days ago

Business Insider hires Brooks as standards editor

Business Insider editor in chief Jamie Heller sent out the following on Monday: I'm excited to share…

2 days ago

Is this the end of CoinDesk as we know it?

Former CoinDesk editorial staffer Michael McSweeney writes about the recent happenings at the cryptocurrency news site, where…

2 days ago

LinkedIn finance editor Singh departs

Manas Pratap Singh, finance editor for LinkedIn News Europe, has left for a new opportunity…

3 days ago

Washington Post announces start of third newsroom

Washington Post executive editor Matt Murray sent out the following on Friday: Dear All, Over the last…

4 days ago