Ryan Chittum of Columbia Journalism Review thinks that Heidi Moore of “Marketplace” shouldn’t have criticized one of her listeners who got upset about Wall Street wanting to cut government subsidies for Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare.
“So, is there another point of view? Yes! Maybe that’s what the listener, not unreasonably, was asking.”
He later writes, “Moore’s been an ardent defender of the business press in the past, particularly over whether it served readers well in the runup to the crisis. We’ve had our disagreements and that’s okay.
“But even those who have paid attention to this story haven’t been well served by the press. And I doubt you’d find many readers or listeners who would tell you different.
“So while ripping the audience is almost always a bad idea, it’s really something when coverage has fallen well short.”
Read more here.
Fox Business host Larry Kudlow has no plans to leave his role amid reports detailing…
Morgan Meaker, a senior writer for Wired covering Europe, is leaving the publication after three…
Nick Dunn, who is currently head of CNBC Events as senior vice president and managing…
Wall Street Journal editor in chief Emma Tucker sent out the following on Friday: Dear…
New York Times metro editor Nestor Ramos sent out the following on Friday: We are delighted to…
Rahat Kapur of Campaign looks at the evolution The Wall Street Journal. Kapur writes, "The transformation…
View Comments
(1) I love Heidi.
(2) Readers complain about sloppy journalism only when they suddenly realize they weren't paying attention. Journalists complain about uninformed readers all the time.
(3) Journalism critics complain for a living, and prove that some things in the universe have no function. This whole tempest is just a waste of hot air we could be using for Point 2.