Mark Albright, the long-time retail reporter for the Tampa Bay Times, has retired after 39 years at the paper.
After covering slow-moving local government and politics for 13 years, Albright shifted his attention to why we buy.
He’s covered the ever-changing business of retailing — from flea markets to Neiman Marcus — since 1986. He’s interviewed most every prominent merchant in the country. He’s profiled Wal-Mart greeters and spent days following department store buyers making their rounds in New York’s garment district.
His work is quoted in retailing textbooks. He buys his own clothes and groceries. He’s tight with a buck, but has been known to splurge. When things get slow at the office, he goes shopping.
On his last day of work, Albright was working on a story right up until walking out the door.
Leo Schwartz of Fortune examines cryptocurrency news operation CoinDesk under its new owners, which forced editors…
New York Times international editor Phil Pan sent out the following on Wednesday: We’re excited…
New York Times business editor Ellen Pollock sent out the following on Wednesday: I’m thrilled to announce…
The Financial Times is looking for a correspondent to cover international trade, based in Washington,…
Nell Mackenzie, a hedge fund reporter at Reuters, spoke on the "Hedge Fund Huddle" podcast…
Fortune magazine jumped two spots to become the No. 8 business news website in November…
View Comments
How WRONG can you be???!!! Mark did not begin working for the St. Petersburg Times in 1973. He began working for the Evening Independent, part of the Times Publishing Company. I don't think Mark became a Times reporter until about 1988 when the Indy folded so the Times could take their boxes and try to go head to head with the Tampa Tribune. Even today that effort to bury the Tribune is not over and is still in the workes. Mark has always been an outstanding journalist and he continued that at the St. Pete Times, now operating under a new name of the Tampa Bay Times, another change designed to get rid of the Tribune.
I thought the Times was interested in getting the story right. I think the blurb above is beneath the standards of those established by the late Nelson Poynter. If you think folks won't notice this selly, self-serving and very big ERROR, think again. I believe it is worth a CORRECTION.